12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061 |
- BASH PATCH REPORT
- =================
- Bash-Release: 4.2
- Patch-ID: bash42-010
- Bug-Reported-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
- Bug-Reference-ID: <201104122356.20160.vapier@gentoo.org>
- Bug-Reference-URL: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-04/msg00058.html
- Bug-Description:
- Bash did not correctly print/reproduce here documents attached to commands
- inside compound commands such as arithmetic for loops and user-specified
- subshells. This affected the execution of such commands inside a shell
- function when the function definition is saved and later restored using
- `.' or `eval'.
- Patch (apply with `patch -p0'):
- *** ../bash-4.2-patched/print_cmd.c 2010-05-30 18:34:08.000000000 -0400
- --- ./print_cmd.c 2011-04-14 10:43:18.000000000 -0400
- ***************
- *** 316,319 ****
- --- 317,321 ----
- skip_this_indent++;
- make_command_string_internal (command->value.Subshell->command);
- + PRINT_DEFERRED_HEREDOCS ("");
- cprintf (" )");
- break;
- ***************
- *** 593,596 ****
- --- 606,610 ----
- indentation += indentation_amount;
- make_command_string_internal (arith_for_command->action);
- + PRINT_DEFERRED_HEREDOCS ("");
- semicolon ();
- indentation -= indentation_amount;
- ***************
- *** 654,657 ****
- --- 668,672 ----
-
- make_command_string_internal (group_command->command);
- + PRINT_DEFERRED_HEREDOCS ("");
-
- if (inside_function_def)
- *** ../bash-4.2-patched/patchlevel.h Sat Jun 12 20:14:48 2010
- --- ./patchlevel.h Thu Feb 24 21:41:34 2011
- ***************
- *** 26,30 ****
- looks for to find the patch level (for the sccs version string). */
-
- ! #define PATCHLEVEL 9
-
- #endif /* _PATCHLEVEL_H_ */
- --- 26,30 ----
- looks for to find the patch level (for the sccs version string). */
-
- ! #define PATCHLEVEL 10
-
- #endif /* _PATCHLEVEL_H_ */
|