123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233 |
- The obsolete patch tries to clear "BUILT_SOURCE"
- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- ***************
- *** 157,163 ****
- bin_PROGRAMS = ntpdc
- EXTRA_PROGRAMS = ntpdc-layout
- EXTRA_DATA = check-layout
- - BUILT_SOURCES = maybe-layout
- INCLUDES = -I$(top_srcdir)/include
- # LDADD might need RESLIB and ADJLIB
- ntpdc_LDADD = version.o ../libntp/libntp.a @READLINE_LIBS@
- --- 157,163 ----
- bin_PROGRAMS = ntpdc
- EXTRA_PROGRAMS = ntpdc-layout
- EXTRA_DATA = check-layout
- + BUILT_SOURCES =
- INCLUDES = -I$(top_srcdir)/include
- # LDADD might need RESLIB and ADJLIB
- ntpdc_LDADD = version.o ../libntp/libntp.a @READLINE_LIBS@
- ------------------------------------------------------------
- The current tarball contains a lot more:
- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
- AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = ../util/ansi2knr
- EXTRA_DATA = check-layout
- BUILT_SOURCES = @MAKE_CHECK_LAYOUT@ ntpdc-opts.c ntpdc-opts.h ntpdc.1 \
- ntpdc-opts.texi ntpdc-opts.menu
- AM_CPPFLAGS = -I$(top_srcdir)/include $(LIBOPTS_CFLAGS)
- # LDADD might need RESLIB and ADJLIB
- ------------------------------------------------------------
- Do we need to remove "@MAKE_CHECK_LAYOUT@" in a new patch?
|