Fix things the other way round. Instead of restoring the mips

embedded pic support into binutils, instead fixup gcc to not emit
any embedded pic relocations.

toolchain/binutils/2.15.94.0.2.2/117_mips_symbolic_link.patch

@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-#! /bin/sh -e
-## 117_mips_symbolic_link.dpatch
-##
-## DP: Description: Handle symbolic multigot links. (#270619)
-## DP: Author: Thiemo Seufer <seufer@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
-## DP: Upstream status: Not submitted
-## DP: Date: 2004-09-08
-
-if [ $# -lt 1 ]; then
-    echo "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument" >&2
-    exit 1
-fi
-
-[ -f debian/patches/00patch-opts ] && . debian/patches/00patch-opts
-patch_opts="${patch_opts:--f --no-backup-if-mismatch} ${2:+-d $2}"
-
-case "$1" in
-    -patch) patch -p1 ${patch_opts} < $0;;
-    -unpatch) patch -R -p1 ${patch_opts} < $0;;
-    *)
-        echo "`basename $0`: script expects -patch|-unpatch as argument" >&2
-        exit 1;;
-esac
-
-exit 0
-
-@DPATCH@
-diff -urpN binutils-2.15.orig/bfd/elfxx-mips.c binutils-2.15/bfd/elfxx-mips.c
---- binutils-2.15.orig/bfd/elfxx-mips.c	2004-05-17 21:36:03.000000000 +0200
-+++ binutils-2.15/bfd/elfxx-mips.c	2004-08-29 08:48:22.000000000 +0200
-@@ -3909,11 +3910,8 @@ mips_elf_create_dynamic_relocation (bfd 
-       /* We must now calculate the dynamic symbol table index to use
- 	 in the relocation.  */
-       if (h != NULL
--	  && (! info->symbolic || (h->root.elf_link_hash_flags
--				   & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_REGULAR) == 0)
--	  /* h->root.dynindx may be -1 if this symbol was marked to
--	     become local.  */
--	  && h->root.dynindx != -1)
-+	  && ((h->root.elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_REGULAR) == 0
-+	      || (h->root.elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_FORCED_LOCAL) == 0))
- 	{
- 	  indx = h->root.dynindx;
- 	  if (SGI_COMPAT (output_bfd))

toolchain/binutils/2.15.94.0.2.2/450-mips-restore-embedded-pic.patch

@@ -1,75 +0,0 @@
---- binutils/gas/config/tc-mips.c.orig	2004-12-20 12:16:50.000000000 -0700
-+++ binutils/gas/config/tc-mips.c	2005-03-02 03:42:08.000000000 -0700
-@@ -10955,8 +10955,6 @@
- 
-   buf = (bfd_byte *) (fixP->fx_frag->fr_literal + fixP->fx_where);
- 
--  assert (! fixP->fx_pcrel);
--
-   /* Don't treat parts of a composite relocation as done.  There are two
-      reasons for this:
- 
-@@ -11000,7 +10998,6 @@
-     case BFD_RELOC_MIPS_CALL_HI16:
-     case BFD_RELOC_MIPS_CALL_LO16:
-     case BFD_RELOC_MIPS16_GPREL:
--      assert (! fixP->fx_pcrel);
-       /* Nothing needed to do. The value comes from the reloc entry */
-       break;
- 
-@@ -12867,8 +12864,23 @@
-   *reloc->sym_ptr_ptr = symbol_get_bfdsym (fixp->fx_addsy);
-   reloc->address = fixp->fx_frag->fr_address + fixp->fx_where;
- 
--  assert (! fixp->fx_pcrel);
--  reloc->addend = fixp->fx_addnumber;
-+  if (fixp->fx_pcrel)
-+    {
-+      if (OUTPUT_FLAVOR == bfd_target_elf_flavour)
-+	{
-+	  /* At this point, fx_addnumber is "symbol offset - reloc->address".
-+	     Relocations want only the symbol offset.  */
-+	  reloc->addend = fixp->fx_addnumber + reloc->address;
-+	}
-+      else
-+	{
-+	  /* A gruesome hack which is a result of the gruesome gas reloc
-+	     handling.  */
-+	  reloc->addend = reloc->address;
-+	}
-+    }
-+  else
-+    reloc->addend = fixp->fx_addnumber;
- 
-   /* Since the old MIPS ELF ABI uses Rel instead of Rela, encode the vtable
-      entry to be used in the relocation's section offset.  */
-@@ -12879,6 +12891,16 @@
-     }
- 
-   code = fixp->fx_r_type;
-+  if (fixp->fx_pcrel)
-+    {
-+      if (code == BFD_RELOC_32)
-+        code = BFD_RELOC_32_PCREL;
-+      else
-+        as_bad_where (fixp->fx_file, fixp->fx_line,
-+		     _("Cannot make %s relocation PC relative"),
-+		     bfd_get_reloc_code_name (code));
-+    }
-+  
- 
-   /* To support a PC relative reloc, we used a Cygnus extension.
-      We check for that here to make sure that we don't let such a
---- binutils/gas/config/tc-mips.h	29 Apr 2004 05:14:22 -0000	1.35
-+++ binutils/gas/config/tc-mips.h	5 May 2004 17:38:51 -0000
-@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@
- 
- #define MAX_MEM_FOR_RS_ALIGN_CODE  (1 + 2)
- 
-+/* We permit PC relative difference expressions when generating
-+   embedded PIC code.  */
-+#define DIFF_EXPR_OK
-+
- /* Tell assembler that we have an itbl_mips.h header file to include.  */
- #define HAVE_ITBL_CPU
- 

toolchain/gcc/3.3.5/820-no-mips-empic-relocs.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+From: cgd at broadcom dot com
+To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
+Cc: mark at codesourcery dot com
+Date: 13 Jun 2004 22:51:30 -0700
+Subject: [trunk + 3.4-branch RFA] don't use empic relocs for mips-linuxeh
+
+This patch changes mips-linux to avoid using embedded-pic relocs for
+its eh data.  (Support for generating these for new code is removed in
+current binutils srcs.)
+
+Relating to this, previously, mips-linux and mips64-linux would use
+different representations for their EH data (even for mips64-linux o32
+abi), due to the mips64-linux n32/64 BFDs not supporting the
+embedded-pic relocs.  This was a bug.
+
+For more explanation, see the thread of the URL quoted in the comment
+in linux.h.
+
+
+Tested the same w/ sources of about a week ago for c/c++ for
+mips-linux (native) before/after.  Also verified .o compatibility
+before/after just to be sure.
+
+I'd like this approved for the branch as well, so 3.4.1 will work
+nicely w/ the next major binutils release.
+
+
+thanks,
+
+chris
+
+2004-06-13  Chris Demetriou  <cgd@broadcom.com>
+
+	* config/mips/linux.h (ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT): Redefine
+	to return DW_EH_PE_absptr.
+
+Index: config/mips/linux.h
+===================================================================
+RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/mips/linux.h,v
+retrieving revision 1.77
+diff -u -p -r1.77 linux.h
+--- gcc/gcc/config/mips/linux.h	19 Feb 2004 22:07:51 -0000	1.77
++++ gcc/gcc/config/mips/linux.h	14 Jun 2004 05:49:51 -0000
+@@ -170,10 +170,11 @@ Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.  */
+ #undef FUNCTION_NAME_ALREADY_DECLARED
+ #define FUNCTION_NAME_ALREADY_DECLARED 1
+ 
+-#define ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT(CODE, GLOBAL)       		\
+-  (flag_pic								\
+-    ? ((GLOBAL) ? DW_EH_PE_indirect : 0) | DW_EH_PE_pcrel | DW_EH_PE_sdata4\
+-   : DW_EH_PE_absptr)
++/* If possible, we should attempt to use GP-relative relocs for this
++   (see <a  href="http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-05/msg00227.html">http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-05/msg00227.html</a>).
++   However, until that is implement, this just uses standard, absolute
++   references.  */
++#define ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT(CODE, GLOBAL)	DW_EH_PE_absptr
+ 
+ /* The glibc _mcount stub will save $v0 for us.  Don't mess with saving
+    it, since ASM_OUTPUT_REG_PUSH/ASM_OUTPUT_REG_POP do not work in the